' oppose Thornton, motive of insurance policy Analysis: drenching drink obstruction era was a failure, said, Prohibition did non achieve its goals. Instead, it added to the problems it was mean to solve\n\n(Thorton, 15). On Midnight of January 16, 1920, one of the in-person habits and customs of to the highest degree Americans suddenly came to a halt. The Eighteenth Amendment was fix into effect and exclusively importing, exporting, transporting, selling, and manufacturing of intoxicating strong drink was shake off to an end. shortly following the saving of the Eighteenth Amendment, the discipline Prohibition Act, or the Volstead Act, as it was called because of its author, Andrew J. Volstead, was tell into effect. This act primed(p) intoxicating pot likker as anything having an inebriantic content of anything more than than 0.5 percent, omitting alcohol apply for medicinal and sacramental purposes. Likewise, this act in addition set up guidelines for enforce ment (Bowen, 154). Prohibition was mean to reduce the intake of alcohol and thereby reduce plague, p overty, terminal rates, and improve the economy and the quality of life. discipline prohibition of alcohol -- the noble sample -- was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve accessible problems, reduce the value burden created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene in America (Thorton, 1). This, however, was undoubtedly to no avail.\n\nThe Prohibition amendment of the 1920s was toothless because it was unenforceable, it caused the explosive step-up of crime, and it increased the centre of alcohol consumption. It is unaccepted to tell whether prohibition is a close thing or a gravely thing. It has never been oblige in this nation said author Fiorella LaGuardia, author of American Prohibition in the 1920s (LaGuardia 46). afterwards(prenominal) the Volstead Act was put into place to determine specific laws and methods of enforcement, the national Prohibition breast was formulated in holy order to watch that the Volstead Act was enforced. Nevertheless, bootleggers and commoners too flagrantly break these laws.\n\nBootleggers smuggled pot likker from oversees and Canada, stole it from organisation warehouses, and produced their own. Many pack hid their liquor in hip flasks, ludicrous books, hollow canes, and anything else they could attain (Bowen, 159). There were besides illegal speak-easies, which replaced saloons after the start of prohibition. By 1925, there were over 100,000 speak-easies in new-made York City only (Bowen, 160). As tidy as the nonsuch sounded, ...prohibition was far easier to make known than to enforce (Wenburn, 234). With...If you privation to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistanc e right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'