'Classical pluralism comes nowhere near capturing the reality of local Essay

Classical pluralism comes nowhere near capturing the reality of local politics (Stone 2008). Discuss - Essay ExampleThis report aims to study the classical pluralist theory and analyze how much it is found in our local politics today. Classical pluralism is the view that politics and decision devising atomic number 18 mostly located in the government, but in that respect atomic number 18 also non-governmental groups who use many resources to exert their influence on politics and decision devising (Barzilai 2003). Discussion What we observe these days in our local politics is actually modernpluralism. It is the reconstruction of political science and advancement in the fundamental and traditional building of classical pluralism of political sociology. Our societies have come a long way from the traditional classic era of classic pluralism of the post second world warfare era. Pluralist legacy emphasized on the primacy on the pluralist social agents and factors. Neopluralism st ill falls in the pluralist legacy of the classic, but it has undergone a series of complicated revisions. There are many theoretical perspectives on one of the most fundamental question of politics. Who should rule? The answer varies from the many, the few, to one? Classical pluralist answer to this question is the rule of many. Although there are non many theories that support the rule of one but classical theories do support the existence of one ruling class or powerful elite. In short we can term it as the rule of the few (Connolly 2010). What is classical pluralism? The central theme of classical pluralism is the concept of unity in diversity proposed by Aristotle. It is also followed by early liberals competitive and representative democracy. This theory of liberal democracy in socially different countries flourished and evolved into what is called Polyarchy. Polyarchy form of pluralism is about effective rule of elected representatives through a process of free and competiti ve elections conducted in the supervision of the civil associations of civil liberties. Polyarchy is root in the heterogeneous pluralist social structure. The era of 1960s and 70s was the era of political and ideological tumultuous and the pluralist theory also responded by evolving into neo pluralist theory. In this theory attention was given to state initiatives. The pluralism of agency was extended to the state-based invade groups (Janosky 2005. The theory of classical pluralism is founded on devil building blocks namely interest groups and power politics. It revolves around the idea that interest groups compete with each other to acquire power to further their own interests. The classical pluralist democracy also has offset in place through self correcting balance of political powers. It believes that all the interest groups will have equal opportunities to influence public decision making process. Classical pluralist theory was more an idealistic vision rather than the actua l situation although proponents of this theory claimed it to be realistic and based on empirical evidence. This was the premiere generation of pluralist. Second generation pluralist also called neopluralist were led by Robert Dahl and Charles Linblom. These second generation pluralist were more realistic and realized the inequalities in the theory which were not in favor of the less disadvantaged. Third generation pluralist restricted the identification and categorization of fixed groups with fixed interests (Behrouzi 2006). What are interest groups? There are two views about