The Reality of the Moon Landing

During the 1960s, the Cold warfargon and the Vietnam War were in full swing, and tensions grew internationally and nationally. People began to lose trust in the moral and ethical behavior of the governing body activity. unity example of this distrust occurred following a major historical neverthelesst around the same measure period. With millions of people watching, a United States astronaut was televised setting keister on the mope for the original time.Some sunplowedics aspect that the stargaze source place was fabricated by the U. S.s desire to beat the Soviet Union in the Space Race however, the points made by these conspiracy theorists are mere speculation, lack solid express and leave to a greater extent than questions than answers. For example, lying rough the authenticity of the get came with excessively much of a assay of getting caught by separate countries. Those who claim the arrive never happened also stated that the slug landing place was filmed on a movie set, but they do non consider that the fussy cause needed to create such a realistic scene were non yet developed soundly rich at that time.If the slug landing was a falsehood, the lie would be an immense secret kept with great difficulty, considering the thousands of people who would be involved in the hoax. This paper will attempt that the moon landing did occur, and will also disprove the opposing side. There was not enough indigence for the U. S presidential term to stage the landing on the moon because that lie would encompass likewise much of a attempt and likelihood of getting caught by the world. Although hot seat Kennedy was under a lot of pressure to compete and exceed in the Space Race with the Soviet Union, that competition only served to motivate success.the Statesn pride and support for the U. S. infinite program was strong and would be even further bolstered if the U. S. would be able to beat the Soviets to the moon. According to the word Th e Decision to Go to the Moon, by Steve Graber, he states that The decision involved much consideration in the beginning make it public, as well as enormous human efforts and expenditures to make what became Project Apollo a reality by 1969. Clearly the decision to formally challenge NASA and the world with this undertaking was not made lightly.Kennedy, at this point, was kinda determined to prove that the U.S. did in fact possess the applied science and the ability to lead the world into blank space. President Kennedy, along with NASA, was determined to get a man to the moon, and he brought the American people together and join them under the common goal of beating their enemy by the end of the decade. Enormous efforts were underway as NASA and the government began constructing their plans. The success in putting a man on the moon gave the U. S. tremendous advances in technology, scientific knowledge, and improved economic and political advantages from the use of satellites.T hus, by analyzing the motives to either fake the landing or to in reality pull the landing off, the obvious answer was that on that point was little incentive to fake the landing and tremendous benefits to actually landing a man on the moon. The U. S. government obtained enough motivation to round the goal of landing a man on the moon by the end of the decade because they would fall upon significant benefits and not because they desperately wanted to beat the Soviets they also had no need to worry about the risk of getting caught since at that place was no need to to lie, thence, the U. S. did land on the moon.Some conspiracy theorists believe that the moon landing was faked because motivation to beat the Soviets to the moon was too strong to delay however the government agnise the other motivations similarly beating the Soviets, so the moon landing did occur. Both the U. S. and Russia were watching to each one other extremely closely, waiting for the other to place. In hi s bind Did NASA Fake the Moon Landing, Ray Villard states that a throng of citizens made a claim that The United States needed to cement its world leadership during the Cold War by pretending to pull off what really was a technologically im attainable stunt.But, the U. S. at this time did possess the correct technology and landing on the moon was not impossible because of the efforts put in by the technicians and scientists to create the necessary machinery. The U. S. also wanted to make their world leadership stronger, but they could not lie to achieve that goal because the Soviets were watching the U. S. and their every move during this time. If the Soviets were to find out the landing was a lie or was staged then they would easily expose the U. S. to the world.But, the Soviets did not deny the landing and recognised the fact the U. S.landed on the moon basic knowing we did actually possess the technology to go to space. This fact al one(a) provides secernate that the governme nt did not stage the moon landing. Even though the U. S. government did desperately want to beat the Soviet Union there was no reason to lie because the U. S. knew they possess the power and the technology to reach their goal. The government also knew that landing on the moon would bring more benefits to them, such as the advancement in science and a broader understanding of space, which would ultimately encourage them to not lie and follow through with their goal to get a man to the moon.With the support and the funds from congress and the backing of the citizens, the U. S. acquired a strong determination to get to the moon first. Even though the theorists claim the motivation was wrong to land on the moon and that the government lie to the world, there is too much evidence in support of the moon landing because we did hold the advanced technology and the correct motivation therefore the moon landing was not faked and did happen.The special effects at this time were not developed enough to stage a realistic moon landing and a film directed on commonwealth would not be able to fool the world, which means there would not be a likely way to fake the landing and the moon landing did occur. During the 1960s the science fiction genre was exclusively emerging and the available special effects technology was not nearly as sophisticated as today. For example, if the moon landing was created using special effects the moon most likely would not notion as real as needed and many people would start questioning the reality of the landing.In the article Villard goes on to state that at that time No microcomputers, digital-image appendageing, or 3-D animation software existed. The decades marge space film, 2001 A Space Odyssey, illustrates the pinnacle of special-effects capability in the 1960s. Even the film, 2001 A Space Odyssey include flaws in regards to special effects because of how underdeveloped they were at the time the movie was made. The claim is that the same manager who filmed the movie was also asked to stage the moon landing.If such were the case, one would expect that the two films should discipline similarities in production value, but the two sets of footage were both quite different from one another. Additional create that the landing was not filmed is provided in video of the astronauts walking on the moon the moonwalk is far too complex to be faked with the available special effects. In the videos, the men are almost floating at points- a feat that would be impossible to portray with the pull of gravity on Earth.1960s America did not possess the movie making capabilities needed to create a believable moon landing on a movie set, leaving one other possibility we actually did set foot on the moon. There are those that believe the moon landing was filmed in a king-sized Hollywood movie set, however, this cannot be true because the movie technology was not capable of such a task and there are clear counter points for each reason the critics say the landing was filmed, such as wherefore there are no stars so there are strong facts that the landing did happen.The critics claim with confidence that the scientific technology was not there to send a man to the moon but they fail to acknowledge the fact that we actually did not hold the technology to produce a realistic film of the landing. The fact of the matter was that because of the advances of top end scientists, engineers, test pilots, medical researchers, from across the rude and the test flights that orbited the Earth, we were able to get a man to walk on the moon for the first time.But, notwithstanding this knowledge, according to an article from International Business Times the condition states Some theorists allege that NASA officials approached Kubrick sometime in early 1968 and asked him to film footage depicting an earth ship landing on the moon and a space traveler walking on the lunar surface. While the claim is a strong idea, the gove rnment would not lie about the landing because they knew the many benefits that would come their way if they were able to land on the moon.The knowledge of what the country would gain pushed them even further to reaching their goal, as they eventually did. Theorists also say that since there was no stars in the photographs brought back, that proves Kubrick filmed the landing because there are billions of stars in space, yet not one star was in the photographs. But the landing took place during the lunar morning with the sun shining too brightly. Similar to the fact that we cannot see the stars from earth during the day, they cannot be seen while in space either they are too bright to be captured in a picture.So the fact that there were not any stars actually helps prove the moon landing was not filmed because that gives more reality to the pictures if thought about from a scientific perspective. Even though the critics accumulated possible theories as to why they believe the landing was filmed, each can be refuted with scientific descriptions, such as why there were no stars or why the flag was moving, and prove that Apollo 11 did land on the moon.If the moon landing never happened and the world was lied to, such a secret would be almost impossible to keep for this long, and therefore gives proofthat the moon landing occurred. Thousands of people would be needed to work on the staging- everyone from makeup artists to the director, and to this day not a single psyche ever come forward claiming the landing was a hoax or even hinted at the possibility. There were also thousands who were a divide of the actual moon landing. In an article from Balance-Today. org the author states, Including the astronauts, scientists, engineers and technicians, more than 400,00 skilled workers contributed to the Apollo project. To date, not one of them even hinted that the landings were faked.Again, there was no hinting or an accidental slip that we never actually succeeded in l anding on the moon and all of these people who were a part of the staged event would gain a lot of fame if they came forward with their story. The Soviet Union would also never keep the secret if they found out. The Soviets were looking for ways to hurt the U. S. and they would not think twice before exposing us to the world if they found out the U. S. government lied. Given human nature and the drive for power, fame, money and glory, it is simply unreasonable to believe a secret this immense could be kept for this long.Considering the fact that nobody came forward and confessed that the moon landing was a lie, then one can conclude the U. S. made the first man walk on the moon. Some say that the reason nobody confessed the landing was faked, was because the government menace and withdrawed people who would potentially leak the secret however the guess of the killings cannot be true because there were too many people involved, and since nobody hinted that the landing was a lie t he landing did actually occur.The theory of the governments murders is farfetched because of the fact that there were thousands who would know and would be involved in the process of not only the actual moon landing, but a staged occurrence as well. In the article Villard states that conspiracy theorists believe that The government scared and murdered potential tattletales, including its own astronaut heroes in a reprehensible assertion that the tragic 1967 Apollo 1 fire was rigged. However, despite the existence of treacherous and shifting governments, the democracy of the United States would never allow the government to carry out such an atrocity.As was becoming more and more the norm, the citizens would ask questions, and the media, along with other countries would also become involved. Also, even though the theorists say the government caused the Apollo 1 tragedy, that theory was proven wrong. After a thorough investigation the tragedy was determined to be caused by a spark f rom a short circuit in a bundle of wires, cursorily causing the fire to spread through the flammable materials. The impossibility was too big for everyone to believe the government could silence or murder anyone involved.There were too many people and too many benefits for a person who could claim they worked on the greatest hoax ever. Even though the theorists tried to come up with an explanation for why nobody confessed, the idea that the government killed everyone is impossible because the murders would be too obvious, which means there was no secret that needed to be kept and no need to kill people who knew, so the moon landing was real. In conclusion, there is too much concrete evidence and reasoning for the moon landing to be faked. The U. S.retained the correct motivation to get to the moon first before the Soviet Union because of the benefits that would come to them such as what the satellites could offer and the scientific discoveries they found. Pulling off the lie would h elp the countrys growing status in the world but they would not gain much more than that besides world able to say they finally beat the Soviets in the Space Race. The moon landing being filmed on a movie set is not possible either because of the lack of the special effects technology during this time.Nothing made on Earth would look real enough to be presented to the world, specially the realistic moonwalk since there is no way to float on Earth. Unlike what the theorists claim, we did possess the scientific technology to go to space and land on the moon because NASA and the government brought in the top end scientists and engineers to implement the task some say was impossible. The secret, if the moon landing was faked, became to enormous to keep and the government could not murder every person without the killings resembling genocide.Since nobody ever came forward with a confession there is nobody to prove the moon landing was staged. As a result, the theories that accumulated after the moon landing cannot be possible because of the scientific evidence and the fact that there were multiple moon landings closely following the first Apollo deputation which means we did possess the technology therefore the U. S. government did not lie and the country did land the first man on the moon.