How does Giddens solve the problem of agency versus structure? Essay ex

Giddens theorizes that structure and agency are a duality that groundworknot exist apart from one another. Human practices create both their consciousness and society. Because individuals profit up societys activities and structural conditions, they can choose to change it. Giddens calls this relationship between knowledge and practices the double hermeneutic. The quotidian routines and practices of individuals interacting with each other is what shape society. The actors have power over their actions, scarcely the consequences are often unpredictable, allowing for change. Structure is defined by the rules and resources of society scarcely without the human factor it cannot exist (Sociological hypothesis Chapter 15 Chapter Summary, 2004). In contrast, he argues that an actor ceases to be an agent if he or she loses the power to make a difference (Ritzer, 2011, p 523). Giddens criticized structural theories that forced extreme limitations on the individual and placed them in a passive role in the creation of society. He suggested that actors could think about what they were doing and adjust their actions accordingly. He defined this ability as reflexive monitoring which is encompassed under the topic of the knowlegability of actors. disrespect this reflective thinking on the part of the actors, sometimes things still go wrong. Giddens view takes into account a persons tilt to misinterpret a situation (no one is perfect). In another scenario, a persons actions might be miscalculated for a number of unconscious reasons. In either case, in his opinion, actors are less knowledgeable than instructive sociologists would suggest (Gelderblom, 2011). Giddens argues that the interaction, between discursive and practical consciousness, is also how... ... systems allows for social changes succession bridging the structure-agency dilemma (Miller, 2007).ReferencesGelderblom, D. (2011). Sociological Theory Study Guide 2, Chapter 3 Anthony Giddens. Retrieved Janu ary 14, 2012, from http//myedison.tesc.edu/tescdocs/Web_Courses/SOC-417 OL/Study_Guide_8e/Study_Guide_2_417_8e.pdfMiller, S. (2007, January 4). cordial Institutions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved January 14, 2012, from http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-institutions/AgeStrRitzer, G. (2011). 10. Sociological theory (8th ed., p. 351-390). New York McGraw-Hill.Sociological Theory Chapter 15 Chapter Summary. (2004). Agency-Structure Integration. Retrieved January 14, 2012, from http//highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0072817186/student_view0/chapter15/chapter_summary.html