Nicholas Romanovs Role In The Russian Revolution "Nicholas Romanov was an ignorant, incompetent and insensible attractor. His reference was the decisive factor in bringing on the revolution""The last Tsar of Russia was a tragic go in a classic case of being a leader in the treat place at the wrong beat. vigor within his power could have prevented the forces of change from overtaking tsarist Russia."To what extent do you agree with these explanations of the collapse of autocracy in Russia?Nicholas Romanov was an indecisive man who was easily influenced by others.
Although it was not his character that was the decisive factor in bringing on the revolution. He may have been a leader at the wrong time but if he had re belatedlyd better for the time he was in power.Russia before 1917 was the largest country under matchless empire. In economic terms it was backward as it was late industrialising and late to emerge from feudalism. In political terms it was likewise backward as there ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment