Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; money, fame, respect, you piddle it. He was one of the leagues most exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he lost it all. Mike Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of running game a dog conflict operation just orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was responsible for the torture and murder of absolved dogs. He was immediately suspended by the NFL without pay and he lost his endorsement deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. Mike was primarily sentenced to 5 years in prison, which was a harsher sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still remains; did Mike Vicks harsher treatment offend the rule of law?

I would obligate to say that the rule of law was not pique in this case because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an unusual sentence, a message was needed to be sent to other high-profile figures and celebrities.



existence such a powerful role model to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worse than it normally would have been. Vick was probably well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still continued it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, privation to exuviate all of his accomplishments down the drain? His betrayal to the people who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was certainly displayed as immature and irresponsible in this case. The jury did what was right to give a harsh sentence, to uphold Mike Vick and other celebrities realize their actions can affect others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper